Car Wars 2011

Ford and General Motors are expected to distribute sizable profit sharing checks to workers, a sure sign of the rebound of these two domestic automobile companies. Also of note, is the labor cost reductions which have contributed to the recovery. Money quote:

The gap in labor costs between Detroit and the foreign-owned factories in the United States has narrowed considerably. Ford’s total labor cost for a worker — a combination of wages, benefits and pensions — has been reduced more than 20 percent and is now about $59 an hour, compared to $56 at Toyota, according to the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich.

This, of course, goes a long way towards explaining the UAW's promised effort to organize the domestic plants of foreign automakers.

The Devil is in the Math

Pro-labor site In These Times has posted a piece claiming an employer's lockout is costing the company more than giving into the union's contract demands. The first question is "why is that news?" One would assume the disrupted continuation of work would be more expensive. Upon closer analysis, . . . more after the jump

Automakers competiveness

We have previously posted about American automakers being a proxy for organized labor. Now we find the bashing of American automakers also falling into the "facts matter" realm. Part of General Motor's turnaround is based on a real reduction of labor costs for hourly workers, according to the Center for Automotive research. In fact, in 2008, the average wage for hourly workers at GM was almost a thousand dollars a year lower than Toyota's average wage. Salaried workers at GM, however, averaged over $40,000 a year more than salaried workers at foreign automakers. This information strongly suggests it is not labor costs subject to collective bargaining which cause GM to be at a competitive disadvantage.