Showing posts with label NAM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NAM. Show all posts
Monday, March 26, 2012
Leak, and it ain't St. David's day
It seems one of the recess appointments to the NLRB has been accused of doing things he should not have done. Republican Terence Flynn is accused of leaking confidential information to two former NLRB members one of whom works for the National Association of Manufacturers, and the other who is a labor advisor to Mitt Romney. Rep. John Kline (R-MN) says the problem is that Flynn's a recess appointment. You can't make this stuff up.
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Court (mostly) upholds NLRB Notice posting requirement
A federal district court judge has ruled the NLRB lawfully implemented a rule requiring employers to post a notice of NLRB rights. The court noted, however, the failure to post a notice could not be a per se violation of Section 8(a)(1). The Board must employ a case by case analysis which should include a finding of interference or infringement upon rights protected by the Act. As a practical matter this provides wide leeway to find a violation in almost all circumstances. The court also rejected the rule's provision that a failure to post could toll the 10(b) limitations period because it conflicted with the statutory mandated period. The requirements become effective April 30.
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Trade Group sues to prevent new notice posting requirement
The National Association of Manufacturer's (NAM) has filed suit to compel the NLRB to suspend its new rule requiring employers to post a notice in the workplace concerning rights employees have under the National Labor Relations Act. It appears this is in keeping with the NAM's battle against regulations it maintains impede productivity and job creation. There is a world of difference between a environmental regulation and a notice posting requirement, but as they are both new regulatory restraint, the NAM is against them. The NLRB requirement requires the posting of a notice that the NLRB provides as a free download. Its hard to distinguish this posting requirement from other requirements under state and federal law which compel employers to post notices to inform employees of their rights. The real issue here is employers fear employees might learn something that they will act upon. There is a strong argument the new requirement, when assessed in the context of the new rules for representation elections the Board has proposed, presents an opportunity for the sophisticated employer who integrates appropriate discussions into a program of education for employees.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Tied together
Sometimes you actually get confirmation of what logic and commons sense tells you is fact. In this case courtesy of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) we see the correlation between the unemployment rate and filed claims of discrimination.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
NAM issues its 2009 Labor Day Report
Lots of fascinating data here. Lots of "worsts." Total non-farm employment has declined almost 6% - - a whopping 6,859,000 jobs lost, nearly 2 million in manufacturing alone. Manufacturing output through July 2009 fell 16.4% from its record high in December of 2007. Unemployment is expected to be at 10% by mid-2010 and not make meaningful improvement until 2011. The report can be downloaded here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)